The 280 Stone Rings of the Atbai: The Saharan Civilisation Pharaonic Egypt Inherited

In May 2026, four archaeologists working in Eastern Sudan’s Atbai Desert published a paper in African Archaeological Review with the unassuming title Atbai Enclosure Burials: Monumentalism, Pastoralism and Environmental Change in the Mid-Holocene East Nubian Deserts. The authors, Julien Cooper of Macquarie University in Sydney, Marie Bourgeois of Université Lumière Lyon 2, Maël Crépy of the French CNRS attached to the HiSoMA research unit in Lyon, and Maria Carmela Gatto of the Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures at the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw, set out the mapping of 280 monumental circular stone enclosures across the Atbai Desert east of the Nile, the survey extending from Upper Egypt to the Eritrean borderlands. Two hundred and sixty of those monuments were previously unrecorded.

The enclosures range from about five to eighty-two metres in diameter. Where the team excavated, they found concentric mass burials, humans laid in arrangement with cattle, sheep, and goats, often around a central figure, with the largest single monument holding around eighteen cattle graves. The dating spans the fourth and third millennia BCE, with the main corpus between roughly 4000 and 3000 BCE. It is contemporary with the Badarian, with Naqada I, II, and III, and with the A-Group of Lower Nubia. It predates the unification of Pharaonic Egypt under Narmer (c. 3100 BCE) by half a millennium at its earliest end and overlaps it at the later end. The paper describes a “common nomadic culture stretching across a vast stretch of desert,” a cattle-centred pastoral tradition that left a monumental landscape larger than France.

This is what a pre-Pharaonic Saharan civilisation looks like when it is finally mapped at scale.

It is not “the real Atlantis,” and the popular-press framing of the discovery as a vanished civilisation is journalistic gloss. (For the long version of how the lost-place archetype attaches to real archaeology versus invented stories, see our Atlantis: What Plato Wrote, and What People Made Up After.) The Atbai monuments were noted in isolation for a century before 2026. G. W. Murray published cattle graves from the Eastern Desert in the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology in 1926, including a brief note on the Bir Asele cemetery. Over the following decades other examples were recorded one at a time. What the 2026 paper supplies is systematic vision, where the previous century had supplied individual sightings. Sentinel and CORONA satellite imagery let Cooper, Crépy, Bourgeois, and Gatto see two hundred and sixty new examples in a single corpus. The recognition that the rings belong to a regional tradition rather than a scatter of unrelated sites is what changed.

The harder claim the paper supports, with the assistance of two decades of intervening climatology and Saharan archaeology, is that these monuments are the missing physical evidence for an Eastern Saharan pastoral substrate population that mainstream Egyptology has been talking around for a century without being able to point to it.

The Green Sahara: what was there before the desert

The Sahara as we know it, the largest hot desert on Earth, is a recent feature of the African landscape. For roughly eleven thousand years, from c. 14,500 to 3,500 BCE, the region was savanna. Lakes and rivers cut the landscape. Hippos lived in the wadis. Cattle, sheep, and people grazed and moved across a green northern Africa. The condition is now called the African Humid Period.

The mechanism is orbital. Earth’s precessional wobble periodically tilts the Northern Hemisphere summer towards the sun in such a way that the African monsoon belt shifts northwards. When that happens, the Sahara gets rain, the lakes fill, and the grass grows. The standard reference is Peter deMenocal and colleagues, Quaternary Science Reviews 19 (2000), pages 347 to 361, Abrupt onset and termination of the African Humid Period, which dated the rapid onset and the surprisingly rapid termination from West African marine sediment cores. The follow-up work by Jessica Tierney, Francesco Pausata, and deMenocal in Science Advances in 2017 used new precipitation proxies to refine the timing and the spatial pattern.

The standard model for what happened to the people inside that landscape is Rudolph Kuper and Stefan Kröpelin’s 2006 Science paper Climate-Controlled Holocene Occupation in the Sahara: Motor of Africa’s Evolution (vol. 313, pages 803 to 807). Kuper and Kröpelin’s group at the University of Cologne had been working the Eastern Sahara for thirty years. They proposed a four-phase periodisation. The wet period roughly from 8500 to 5300 BCE supported broad pastoralist occupation across the Sahara. From about 5300 BCE the southern Sahara began to dry, pushing populations and herds northward and eastward in a “desiccation corridor.” By about 3500 BCE the central Sahara was arid; the surviving pastoralist populations had concentrated along the Nile and at the southern margins of the desert. The Atbai sits squarely on the eastern arm of Kuper and Kröpelin’s predicted corridor. It is where the model says a pastoralist substrate population should be visible, in the millennium before Egypt’s unification, with the cattle-centred ritual practice they had carried out of the central Sahara.

There is a striking detail in this story. The Green Sahara should, on the orbital evidence alone, have ended earlier than it did. Christopher Brierley, Katie Manning, and Mark Maslin’s 2018 paper in Nature Communications (article 4018) modelled the African Humid Period’s expected end against the actual archaeological record of human occupation, and found a gap of roughly five hundred years. Their interpretation is that human pastoralism actively delayed the end of the Green Sahara. Controlled grazing and the burning regimes that pastoral peoples use to manage grassland appear to have buffered the orbital climate signal for about half a millennium. The cattle people kept their own world alive against the precession clock for as long as they could. The standard nineteenth-century framing of pastoralism as a cause of desertification turns out, in the deep prehistoric case, to be the precise inverse of what happened.

What the Atbai burials contain

The 2026 paper is restrained about the cosmological interpretation of the monuments, and that restraint is part of why the paper is good. Cooper and his collaborators describe a “cattle-centred behaviour” rather than a “religion.” They describe a regional koiné rather than a polity. They count what they can count and date what they can date, and they leave the interior life of the people who built the monuments as the open question it is.

What can be reported from the excavated examples is the consistent internal structure. The enclosures are circular walls in stacked stone, in some cases reaching eighty-two metres in diameter. The interior contains burials in which human remains are accompanied by the remains of cattle, sheep, and goats. Where the excavation has been thorough enough to read the spatial arrangement, the multi-species inhumation is concentric: a central human figure surrounded by herd animals in arrangement around it. Murray’s 1926 report on the Eastern Desert cattle graves already showed the multi-species pattern. Subsequent twentieth-century work added detail. The 2026 paper systematises it.

The central-figure-plus-animals layout is the most informative single feature for comparative work. It does not match a sacrifice-and-feast pattern (which would scatter the animal remains). It does not match a separate-burial pattern (which would put the animals elsewhere). It matches the cattle-burial tradition that has been documented at Nabta Playa in the Western Desert of Egypt (Fred Wendorf and Romuald Schild’s Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara, 2 vols., Kluwer Academic 2001-2002), at Wadi Takarkori in southern Libya (Savino di Lernia and colleagues, PLOS ONE 8 (2013), e56879), and in the Wadi Howar / Yellow Nile cluster in central Sudan that Kuper and Kröpelin’s group mapped in the 1980s and 1990s. The same multi-species burial logic appears across three thousand kilometres of the Saharan belt. The Atbai is the eastern edge of it.

The 2026 paper steps short of saying what the central figure represents, and that restraint is exactly right. The honest answer is that the cosmological reading of a Neolithic Saharan multi-species burial is, today, the work of comparative anthropology rather than of textual evidence, and the comparative anthropology of pastoral peoples (the Nuer and Dinka of South Sudan, the Maasai of East Africa, the various Beja groups of the modern Atbai itself) suggests that cattle in pastoral ritual frequently mark ancestor relationships, social status, and the transit between life and death. None of that is proof for the Atbai case. It is the comparative context in which the question gets asked.

The comparative landscape: Nabta Playa, Tassili, Wadi Howar

The Atbai is not a singular phenomenon. The Saharan Holocene left a connected network of pastoral ritual landscapes, and the 2026 paper’s importance is partly that it fills a long-suspected gap in that network.

Nabta Playa. Roughly 100 kilometres west of Abu Simbel, in the Western Desert of Egypt. Fred Wendorf and Romuald Schild’s Combined Prehistoric Expedition worked the site from 1973 to 2000. The published monographs are Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara in two volumes (Kluwer Academic / Plenum 2001 and 2002). Nabta Playa is a ritual landscape of standing stones, sub-tumuli with cattle burials, and the controversial “calendar circle” of upright stones whose alignment to the summer solstice has been disputed in print (Thomas Brophy and P. A. Rosen argued for an astronomical interpretation in Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry in 2005; Juan Antonio Belmonte and Mosalam Shaltout pushed back in subsequent work). The site is dated to roughly 9000 to 3000 BCE in its full occupational span, with the megalithic phase in the late Neolithic. The cattle burials at Nabta and the cattle burials in the Atbai are structurally cousins.

Saharan pastoral rock art. The Tassili n’Ajjer in southeastern Algeria (Henri Lhote’s 1956 expedition; Lhote’s À la découverte des fresques du Tassili, Paris, 1958; English edition Hutchinson, 1959), the Acacus in southwestern Libya, Wadi Methkandoush in the Libyan Fezzan. The “Pastoral period” rock art (roughly 5500 to 2000 BCE) covers cliff faces across the central Sahara with cattle, herders, dance scenes, multi-species composition. The modern scholarship on the Saharan rock art chronology is set out by Jean-Loïc Le Quellec in Rock Art in Africa: Mythology and Legend (Flammarion, 2004) and subsequent papers. The same cattle-pastoralist economy and ritual life that the rock art shows in the central Sahara is what the Atbai burials register at the eastern edge of the same world.

Wadi Takarkori. Savino di Lernia of Sapienza University of Rome has excavated this rock shelter in the Acacus since 2003. The Takarkori dairy-fat residues in pottery, published in Nature by Julie Dunne and colleagues in 2012 (vol. 486, pages 390 to 394), established that Saharan pastoralists were milking cattle by the fifth millennium BCE, contemporary with the Atbai monuments. The cattle burials at Takarkori, published by di Lernia in PLOS ONE in 2013, show the same multi-species inhumation logic as the Atbai.

Wadi Howar. The “Yellow Nile” of the central Sudan, a now-dry palaeo-river system mapped by Kuper and Kröpelin’s group at Cologne. Pastoral occupation and multi-species burials are documented along its course. The Wadi Howar evidence is the central-Sudanese link between the eastern Atbai burials and the western Saharan rock art.

Cooper, Crépy, Bourgeois, and Gatto’s 2026 paper, taken alongside these comparative sites, lets the reader see the Saharan late Neolithic as a coherent ritual world. Cattle were the wealth, cattle were the marker of identity, and the dead were buried with cattle. The world stretched from the Acacus to the Atbai. The Atbai burials are a regional expression of it, mapped now at the scale at which it has long been visible across the rest of the Saharan belt.

The Egyptian inheritance

The Pharaonic state, as it consolidates under the Naqada III rulers and finally under Narmer around 3100 BCE, inherits this Saharan pastoral world. The argument has been made carefully and slowly in the Egyptological literature since the late twentieth century. The cleanest single statement is David Wengrow’s The Archaeology of Early Egypt: Social Transformations in North-East Africa, 10,000 to 2,650 BC (Cambridge University Press, 2006), which reads the Egyptian dynastic state not as a sudden Nile-valley invention but as the codification, by a centralising elite, of a much older Sub-Saharan pastoral substrate.

The evidence Wengrow assembles is mostly iconographic and material. The cattle palettes and bull palettes of the late Predynastic period (the Battlefield Palette, the Bull Palette, and the Narmer Palette itself, all dating to the Naqada III phase c. 3200-3000 BCE) depict the king as a bull trampling enemies. The Narmer Palette is the canonical example: on the reverse, Narmer in the white crown smites a kneeling enemy; on the obverse, Narmer-as-bull tramples a fallen man and breaks the wall of a fortified town. The Apis bull, the sacred bull of Memphis whose burials at the Saqqara Serapeum continued from the Early Dynastic period to the Ptolemies, is a direct continuation of cattle veneration into the historical Egyptian state. Hathor, the cow goddess of the sky, mother and consort of the sun, with the sun-disc between her horns, was one of the most ancient and widely worshipped Egyptian deities, with attestations from the Early Dynastic period at sites including Helwan (E. Christiana Köhler, Helwan I, Heidelberg, 2005).

The Atbai monuments slot into this argument as physical evidence for the substrate population whose ritual life the Egyptian state was codifying. The chronological overlap is total. The geographical fit is exact: the Kuper-Kröpelin desiccation corridor predicts populations moving from the central and eastern Sahara towards the Nile valley between roughly 5300 and 3500 BCE, which is precisely when the Atbai burials were being built and precisely when the Badarian, Naqada I and II, and A-Group cultures were forming in the Nile valley. The ritual continuity from Saharan cattle-burials to Pharaonic cattle-iconography is documented; what was missing was the physical archaeology of the source population. The Atbai paper supplies it.

This does not mean the Atbai pastoralists “were” the Egyptians. The genetic, linguistic, and demographic question of who exactly migrated when, and what populations were already in the Nile valley, is its own large and unresolved literature. What the Atbai discovery supports is a softer and more important claim: the Saharan pastoral cattle-burial tradition is the substrate, and the Egyptian dynastic cattle cult is the codification. The Apis and the Hathor and the Narmer-as-bull are the recipients of the tradition, not its inventors.

Why Egyptology has been slow to see this

The Atbai monuments were not unknown to twentieth-century archaeology. They were unmapped and unsystematised. The reason is partly logistical (the Atbai is hard country and survey is expensive) and partly disciplinary. Egyptology as a field developed in the nineteenth century with a Nile-valley focus and a frame inherited from Greek and Roman writers who had treated Pharaonic Egypt as the Mediterranean exception, the African civilisation that the Greeks were willing to take seriously because it produced monumental architecture in stone. The desert peoples south and west of the Nile were, in the same frame, peripheral. They appear in Pharaonic records as the medjay, the desert auxiliaries, valued as soldiers and feared as raiders but not as the ancestors of anything.

The reframing began with the Senegalese historian Cheikh Anta Diop. His Nations nègres et culture (Présence africaine, 1954), Antériorité des civilisations nègres (Présence africaine, 1967), and Civilization or Barbarism (Lawrence Hill Books, 1991, French original 1981) argued that Pharaonic Egypt was substantively a Black African civilisation, culturally continuous with the Sub-Saharan world to its south. At the 1974 UNESCO symposium in Cairo on the peopling of ancient Egypt, Diop made the case formally to a room of Egyptologists. The proceedings appear in General History of Africa, Volume II: Ancient Civilizations of Africa, edited by G. Mokhtar (UNESCO / Heinemann, 1981).

The honest historiographical reading is that the room did not, in the main, agree with Diop’s specific arguments about race and priority. What Diop changed was the framing question. The post-Diop generation could no longer treat Pharaonic Egypt as a Mediterranean exception; the question of Egypt’s African deep prehistory was now openly on the table.

The disciplinary architecture followed. The African Archaeological Review, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field, was founded in 1983 by Nicholas David at Cambridge University Press. Bruce Trigger’s A History of Archaeological Thought (Cambridge UP, 1989) reset the methodological frame on how nineteenth-century European archaeology had organised its racial-civilisational categories. The 1990s and 2000s saw the rehabilitation of Nubian archaeology: Charles Bonnet’s continuing excavations at Kerma, which produced the Sudan’s first Bronze Age kingdom (Bonnet and Valbelle, The Nubian Pharaohs: Black Kings on the Nile, American University in Cairo Press, 2006); David Edwards’s The Nubian Past (Routledge, 2004); Stuart Tyson Smith’s Wretched Kush (Routledge, 2003). The recognition that the 25th Dynasty Pharaohs (Piye, Shabaka, Taharqa) were a Kushite empire that ruled Egypt, not Egyptians who happened to be Nubian, became standard.

Cooper, Crépy, Bourgeois, and Gatto’s 2026 paper is the current generation of this work. The Atbai survey is the kind of project that became possible only after the disciplinary reframing was in place, after the satellite imagery (CORONA declassified in 1995, Sentinel since 2014) became routinely available, and after the methodological assumption that the Eastern Desert pastoral peoples were worth mapping at scale had become normal rather than novel. Cooper’s earlier work on the medjay desert polities (Old World vol. 1, 2021) and on the 2018-2019 Atbai rock-art survey (Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, OnlineFirst 2023) had been preparing the ground.

The reframing is not without its overstretches. Some Afrocentric extensions of Diop’s argument into popular literature (the recurring “Cleopatra was Black” debates, claims about Egyptian origins in the African Great Lakes, “stolen civilisation” framings) have hardened into a popular narrative that doesn’t always track with the careful scholarship. The honest position is that documenting indigenous African deep prehistory is a genuine scholarly correction, and the corrected story does not need to be a racial-priority story. The Atbai monuments are important because they show a coherent monumental pastoral tradition contemporary with predynastic Egypt, not because they prove anyone’s racial point about who built what first.

The race to publish: Sudan in wartime

The Atbai paper was based on fieldwork carried out before April 2023. On 15 April 2023 the Sudan Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces began the civil war that as of 2026 continues across much of the country. The Sudan National Museum in Khartoum was looted in the war’s first weeks. Sites across Northern, River Nile, and Red Sea states have been damaged. Field seasons have been impossible for most of the international missions working in Sudan since spring 2023. Several summaries of the damage to Sudan’s archaeological heritage have appeared in Antiquity and the Sudan-focused archaeological press since 2024.

The publication of the Cooper, Crépy, Bourgeois, and Gatto paper in 2026 is, in part, a publication of work that field conditions no longer permit anyone to repeat or to expand. The 280 monuments are mapped. The detailed excavation programme that the paper would normally generate as its follow-up is suspended until the security situation allows fieldwork to return. The interpretive arguments about what the central figures represent, who built the monuments, and how the regional tradition relates to the Nile valley state-formation story will, for now, be made from this paper and the comparative material that other Saharan teams have produced since the 1970s.

There is a Position Three handle here. The discoveries of the next decade in Eastern Sudan and the Atbai will depend on the war ending and on Sudanese archaeological institutions being rebuilt. The current generation of scholarship has done the difficult work of mapping a major pre-Pharaonic Saharan pastoral civilisation in time to publish before the field closed. The next generation will need a country in which to continue.

What the 280 rings show, and what they do not

The Atbai discovery does not solve any of the standing questions in Egyptology in a single stroke. It does not name the people who built the monuments. It does not give us their language. It does not establish a direct genetic descent from Atbai pastoralists to the Pharaonic Egyptian state. None of those are claims the 2026 paper makes, and any popular framing that suggests otherwise is overstatement.

What the discovery does establish, and establishes well, is that a coherent monumental funerary tradition existed across the Eastern Sahara between roughly 4500 and 2500 BCE, that the tradition was cattle-centred and multi-species in its burial logic, that it sits exactly on the Kuper-Kröpelin desiccation corridor at exactly the moment that corridor was funnelling populations towards the Nile valley, and that it is contemporary with and structurally related to other Saharan pastoral ritual landscapes from the Acacus in the west to the Wadi Howar in the south.

It also re-grounds an argument that has been around in careful Egyptological writing for twenty years, in physical archaeology rather than in iconographic inference alone. The cattle imagery of early dynastic Egypt is not a Pharaonic invention. The Apis bull is not a Pharaonic invention. Hathor is not a Pharaonic invention. They are the codification, by a centralising state in the Nile valley, of a much older Saharan pastoral cattle complex. The complex is now visible in stone, eighty metres across, two hundred and sixty new times, on the eastern arm of the Saharan corridor where the populations who carried it were converging on Egypt as the Sahara dried around them.

The interesting question is not whether these people “were” the Egyptians, or whether anyone was first. The interesting question is what the Egyptian state did with the inheritance, what it kept and what it dropped, and what the Saharan pastoral cosmology might have looked like in its own terms before the temple architecture and the royal iconography started to flatten it into a literary and statist religion.

The Atbai monuments do not answer that question. They are part of the corpus from which the answer might one day be reconstructed. Two hundred and sixty new entries in the corpus, mapped from satellite, ground-truthed by Cooper, Crépy, Bourgeois, and Gatto in fieldwork that the Sudanese war then ended, are a substantial down payment on a story that the discipline has been trying to tell for fifty years and has only just acquired the physical evidence to tell properly.

The Egyptians, on the new picture, did not invent civilisation in northeastern Africa. They inherited a Saharan one, codified it, wrote it down, built temples to it, and forgot the desert from which it came. The desert is now starting to be readable again.

The bones are in the rings. The rings are in the satellite imagery. The satellite imagery is in African Archaeological Review 2026, DOI 10.1007/s10437-026-09654-y. Two hundred and sixty of them. Eighty metres across at the largest. Humans and cattle arranged in concentric layers around a central figure. The Saharan civilisation that Egypt inherited, mapped at last, while there is still time to publish.

Image Sources

• Hero (an Atbai enclosure burial, c. 3500 BCE): original dark-romanticism reconstruction by The Crazy Alchemist, generated with Google Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro), May 2026. No photograph of an in-situ Atbai enclosure burial has been published in the public domain to date.
• Nabta Playa Calendar Circle (reconstruction): Photograph by Raymbetz, 21 March 2009, of the reconstructed calendar-circle stones displayed at the Nubia Museum in Aswan, Egypt. The original stones are in the Western Desert about 100 kilometres west of Abu Simbel. CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
• Tassili n’Ajjer rock-art panel: Photograph by IssamBarhoumi, 10 February 2023, of a Neolithic painted panel in Tassili n’Ajjer National Park, Djanet, southern Algeria. The rock art itself is c. 5500-2000 BCE (Pastoral Period). CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons.
• The Western Deffufa at Kerma: Photograph by Walter Callens, 26 March 2009, of the mudbrick temple monument of the Kerma kingdom (c. 2500-1500 BCE) in northern Sudan. CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

Sources

Bibliography. The same list is held in the article’s frontmatter for the citation tools that read it programmatically.

• Cooper, Julien, Marie Bourgeois, Maël Crépy, and Maria Carmela Gatto. ‘Atbai Enclosure Burials: Monumentalism, Pastoralism and Environmental Change in the Mid-Holocene East Nubian Deserts.’ African Archaeological Review (2026), DOI 10.1007/s10437-026-09654-y
• Murray, G. W. ‘Graves of oxen in the Eastern Desert of Egypt.’ Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 12/3-4 (1926): 248-249
• deMenocal, Peter, Joseph Ortiz, Tom Guilderson, Jess Adkins, Michael Sarnthein, Linda Baker, and Martha Yarusinsky. ‘Abrupt onset and termination of the African Humid Period: rapid climate responses to gradual insolation forcing.’ Quaternary Science Reviews 19/1-5 (2000): 347-361
• Kuper, Rudolph, and Stefan Kröpelin. ‘Climate-Controlled Holocene Occupation in the Sahara: Motor of Africa’s Evolution.’ Science 313/5788 (11 August 2006): 803-807
• Brierley, Chris, Katie Manning, and Mark Maslin. ‘Pastoralism may have delayed the end of the green Sahara.’ Nature Communications 9, no. 4018 (2018), DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06321-y
• Tierney, Jessica E., Francesco S. R. Pausata, and Peter B. deMenocal. ‘Rainfall regimes of the Green Sahara.’ Science Advances 3/1 (2017), e1601503
• Wendorf, Fred, and Romuald Schild. Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara, Volume 1: The Archaeology of Nabta Playa. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, 2001
• Wendorf, Fred, and Romuald Schild. Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara, Volume 2: The Pottery of Nabta Playa. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, 2002
• Wendorf, Fred, and Romuald Schild. ‘Late Neolithic megalithic structures at Nabta Playa.’ Sahara 10 (1998): 7-16
• Brophy, Thomas G., and P. A. Rosen. ‘Satellite imagery measures of the astronomically aligned megaliths at Nabta Playa.’ Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 5/1 (2005): 15-24 (the astronomical-alignment hypothesis; subsequently disputed by Belmonte and Shaltout)
• Belmonte, Juan Antonio, and Mosalam Shaltout. ‘Keeping Ma’at Alive: Astronomy and the Religious Calendar in Ancient Egypt.’ In In Search of Cosmic Order: Selected Essays on Egyptian Archaeoastronomy, ed. Belmonte and Shaltout, 271-300. Cairo: SCA Press, 2009
• Brunton, Guy, and Gertrude Caton-Thompson. The Badarian Civilisation and Predynastic Remains near Badari. London: British School of Archaeology in Egypt, 1928
• Petrie, William Matthew Flinders, and James Edward Quibell. Naqada and Ballas, 1895. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1896
• Reisner, George A. The Archaeological Survey of Nubia, Report for 1907-1908. Cairo: National Printing Department, 1910, 2 vols.
• Williams, Bruce B. The A-Group Royal Cemetery at Qustul, Cemetery L. Oriental Institute Nubian Expedition Vol. 3. Chicago: Oriental Institute, 1986 (the Qustul incense burner hypothesis; substantially revised by subsequent scholarship)
• Bonnet, Charles, and Dominique Valbelle. The Nubian Pharaohs: Black Kings on the Nile. Cairo and New York: American University in Cairo Press, 2006
• Welsby, Derek A. The Kingdom of Kush: The Napatan and Meroitic Empires. London: British Museum Press, 1996
• Edwards, David N. The Nubian Past: An Archaeology of the Sudan. London and New York: Routledge, 2004
• Wengrow, David. The Archaeology of Early Egypt: Social Transformations in North-East Africa, 10,000 to 2,650 BC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006
• Wilkinson, Toby A. H. Early Dynastic Egypt. London and New York: Routledge, 1999
• Hendrickx, Stan. ‘Predynastic-Early Dynastic Chronology.’ In Ancient Egyptian Chronology, ed. Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton, 55-93. Leiden: Brill, 2006
• Köhler, E. Christiana. Helwan I: Excavations in the Early Dynastic Cemetery, Season 1997/98. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag, 2005
• Diop, Cheikh Anta. Nations nègres et culture. Paris: Présence africaine, 1954
• Diop, Cheikh Anta. Antériorité des civilisations nègres. Paris: Présence africaine, 1967
• Diop, Cheikh Anta. Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology. Brooklyn: Lawrence Hill Books, 1991 (orig. French 1981)
• UNESCO. General History of Africa, Volume II: Ancient Civilizations of Africa, ed. G. Mokhtar. Paris: UNESCO / London: Heinemann, 1981 (proceedings of the 1974 Cairo symposium)
• Trigger, Bruce G. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989
• Lhote, Henri. À la découverte des fresques du Tassili. Paris: Arthaud, 1958; English ed. The Search for the Tassili Frescoes. London: Hutchinson, 1959
• Le Quellec, Jean-Loïc. Rock Art in Africa: Mythology and Legend. Paris: Flammarion, 2004
• Dunne, Julie, Richard P. Evershed, Mélanie Salque, Lucy Cramp, Silvia Bruni, Kathleen Ryan, Stefano Biagetti, and Savino di Lernia. ‘First dairying in green Saharan Africa in the fifth millennium BC.’ Nature 486 (21 June 2012): 390-394
• di Lernia, Savino, et al. ‘Inside the African Cattle Complex: Animal Burials in the Holocene Central Sahara.’ PLOS ONE 8/2 (2013): e56879
• Hassan, Fekri A. ‘The Predynastic of Egypt.’ Journal of World Prehistory 2/2 (1988): 135-185
• Stojanowski, Christopher M. Bioarchaeology of the African Diaspora in the Americas. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2010
• Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boundaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. London and New York: Routledge, 2003
• Cooper, Julien. ‘Between the Nile and the Red Sea: Medjay Desert Polities in the Third to First Millennium BCE.’ Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia 1/1 (2021): 1-22
• Cooper, Julien, and Dorian Vanhulle. ‘Rock Art Surveys in the Sudanese Eastern Desert: Results of the 2018-2019 Atbai Survey Project.’ Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 109/1-2 (2023): 189-208, DOI 10.1177/03075133231211917
• Larrasoaña, Juan C., Andrew P. Roberts, and Eelco J. Rohling. ‘Dynamics of Green Sahara Periods and Their Role in Hominin Evolution.’ PLOS ONE 8/10 (2013): e76514
• Manning, Katie, and Adrian Timpson. ‘The demographic response to Holocene climate change in the Sahara.’ Quaternary Science Reviews 101 (2014): 28-35